Initial D World - Discussion Board / Forums
   
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )Resend Validation Email

DJ Panel ( Server Stats )   Song History   Initial D World Chat Room (Discord)   Broadband Stream
RADIO BROADCAST » streaming at 96kbps with 2 unique listeners, playing m.o.v.e - soukyuu no flight

       

  Automotive Section Rules
• Scenes depicted in Initial D are strictly fiction. Please follow the traffic rules and drive safely.
• When posting a classified thread, please label it with For Sale (FS), For Trade (FT) or Want To Buy (WTB) in the thread title.
• Use the Search function before you start a new topic. Posting a duplicated thread may earn yourself a verbal warning.
• Personal videos of illegal street racing are prohibited. Do NOT brag about your exploits. Posting a video depicting dangerous/reckless driving behavior on your part will result in an actual warning.

» FORUM MODERATOR : FORUM MODERATOR

2 Pages  1 2  ( Go to first unread post )

Views: 4,370  ·  Replies: 30 
> Ford Mustang SVO., You people ever heard of it?
Jayson
Posted: Feb 26 2003, 09:30 PM


IDW Posts A Freaking LOT Member
**********

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 10,554
Member No.: 32
Joined: Sep 26th 2002
Location: Orlando, FL





who is mad max?!? blink.gif

Shmuck I say! Shmuck!
Wheels84ss
Posted: Feb 28 2003, 01:26 PM


IDW Prime Member
**********

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 607
Member No.: 275
Joined: Feb 25th 2003
Location: Sayreville, NJ





No not kidding at all. The 2.3T was a nightmare of a motor, and the "Special" SVO suspension was nothing more then slightly stiffer springs and better shocks. For the pricetag of the SVO you could put the same setup in an LX and still have enough for a new paintjob and dinner with your girl.

GoFastLookSlow
  Posted: Feb 28 2003, 02:26 PM


♪ don't say lazy ♪
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 170
Member No.: 86
Joined: Nov 17th 2002
Location: Update Profile





QUOTE (Wheels84ss @ Feb 28 2003, 01:23 PM)
No not kidding at all.  The 2.3T was a nightmare of a motor, and the "Special" SVO suspension was nothing more then slightly stiffer springs and better shocks.  For the pricetag of the SVO you could put the same setup in an LX and still have enough for a new paintjob and dinner with your girl.

Stiffer springs and shocks?! HAHAHAHAHAH!!!! Yeah, modified front geometry and 15:1 power-assisted rack-and-pinion steering. Rear suspension featured a limited slip, 3.73:1 Traction-Lok axle. The Mustang SVO's suspension included many firsts -- it was the first Mustang to have as standard equipment all of the following: Koni gas filled/adjustable struts, shocks, and horizontal dampers; 5-lug, 16 x 7 inch aluminum wheels; P225-16 Goodyear Eagle VR 50 "Gatorbacks''; and four-wheel ventilated disc brakes, and as we all know, that = stiffer springs and shocks. And you obviously know nothing about the 2.3T. Please.. feel free to reply. rolleyes.gif

Jayson
Posted: Feb 28 2003, 10:52 PM


IDW Posts A Freaking LOT Member
**********

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 10,554
Member No.: 32
Joined: Sep 26th 2002
Location: Orlando, FL





Oh yeah! well a JAM was the first to put foot:to:GFLSface! the JAM was also better looking too! It had sexy:awesomeness, well the GFLS had ugly:fat rate.
Wheels84ss
Posted: Mar 2 2003, 10:28 PM


IDW Prime Member
**********

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 607
Member No.: 275
Joined: Feb 25th 2003
Location: Sayreville, NJ





Well other then the 3.73 all the components you describe are COPO on an 88 stang. Granted the SVO was the first, 84-86 production run, but the components are still there. And if you seriously wanna debate the mechanical value of ford's 2.3 turbo you either have a love affair with this particular motor, or you had the best luck in the world with the one you had. There was a reason ford discontinued the motor, it packed to many recalls. If the company is willing to admit it's an anchor, why is it that so many people wanna defend this engine. Because it was a predessor and followed the Japanese import ideals. The ford 2.3 and dode 2.2 and 2.5 torubos were horrible motors, no where near the levels of there across the ocean brothers. Even the GN 3.8 Gran National motor left severe lacks in dependibility for a turbo motor. There is a reason American car companies shy away from Turbos, they can't build them right, ask anyone that has ever turned a wrench for a living, not just on a backyard toy.

Jayson
Posted: Mar 2 2003, 10:35 PM


IDW Posts A Freaking LOT Member
**********

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 10,554
Member No.: 32
Joined: Sep 26th 2002
Location: Orlando, FL





turbo mustangs=not right

2 Pages  1 2