Initial D World - Discussion Board / Forums [Powered by Invision Power Board]

Printable Version of Topic
Click here to view this topic in its original format

Initial D World - Discussion Board / Forums > Artworks and Graphics > Some pics from my part of the world...

Posted by: AJO Sep 16 2004, 04:31 PM

Just thought that I would show you guys some of the cars that exists around where I live...

1991 Ford Sierra Cosworth AWD 2,0 Turbo, belongs to a friend of mine. Should have around 600 hp. 11,45s/202 km/h at 1/4 mile.
http://bilar.silverplanet.se/albums/Raceinorr-Sensommartr%E4ff-2004/PICT0217.jpg

2003 Saab 9-3 Aero, not much tuning at all, but good looking...

http://bilar.silverplanet.se/albums/Raceinorr-Sensommartr%E4ff-2004/PICT0208.jpg

Mitsu Lancer Evo1 GSR. exhaust, airfilter and gizzmo-chip, 12,27s at 1/4 mile.
http://bilar.silverplanet.se/albums/Raceinorr-Sensommartr%E4ff-2004/PICT0231.jpg

1994 Volvo 850 T5, donÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´t know much about it.
http://htpc.hemma.melmac.se/rin_vartraff_2004/images/DSC01078.jpg
http://htpc.hemma.melmac.se/rin_vartraff_2004/images/DSC01075.jpg

1992 Audi S4 2,2 turbo quattro, about 550 hp. 1,8 tons and 12,5 at 1/4 mile.
http://htpc.hemma.melmac.se/rin_vartraff_2004/images/DSC01156.jpg
http://htpc.hemma.melmac.se/rin_vartraff_2004/images/DSC01420.jpg

2000 Subaru Impreza 22B-STI (iÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´m not sure about that though), brought in from GB, never sold new in sweden. The dyno said 340 hp at the wheels after some minor tuning, if I remember it right...
http://htpc.hemma.melmac.se/rin_vartraff_2004/images/DSC01433.jpg

ThatÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´s what I came up with at the moment.

Hope you like at least some of them.

Posted by: Benji Sep 16 2004, 04:47 PM

The EVO I is a beast.

Posted by: 4g63 Sep 16 2004, 04:57 PM

Personally that first car is Ghey.

Posted by: AJO Sep 16 2004, 05:02 PM

Ben: Yeah, itÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´s a nice car.

Same car, just started off: http://race.ulkhyvlers.net/dragrace/Pite/040822/DSC05137.JPG

Also found some more pics...

BMW M3 Turbo, best quartermile-time: 9,47s and 242 km/h! Still legal to drive on the streets.

Well, almost...

http://race.ulkhyvlers.net/dragrace/Pite/040822/DSC05026.JPG
Movieclip of the 9,47 sec run: http://nalle.puh.org/~sundis/hammarstrom_m3_9.47_242_bysundis_widedivx.avi

Ford Capri MK1 with a 2,8 litre V6, converted with two Mitsu 15T turbos and some other stuff. Best quartermile: 11,94s.
http://race.ulkhyvlers.net/dragrace/Pite/040822/DSC05186.JPG

Mitsu Lancer Evo5 RS, best quartermile: 11,72s. 380 hp at the wheels.
http://race.ulkhyvlers.net/dragrace/Pite/040822/DSC05082.JPG

4g63: Yep, might look ghey, but itÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´s fast...

Posted by: But she looked 18 officer Sep 16 2004, 05:08 PM

600hp and it does 11's? That sounds like a Supra story to me. If IDW had one I would raise the bs flag icon on that one..
As much as I hate to admit it, I kind of agree with 4g, it looks abit wild/tacky/ricey but thats irelivent since its just my opinion. I do love the cosworth though

That red saab looks real nice.

Posted by: AJO Sep 16 2004, 05:21 PM

I canÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´t swear that it has 600 hp, itÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´s just a qualified guess by the man who did the fuelmap for it. 11.45s is the best quartermile-time, and after that it has been rewarded with a bigger turbo, agressive camshafts, racingfuelmap and some other things that I donÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´t remember now.

A movieclip of it, though: http://www.raceinorr.com/~ajo/ajo/buffy-cossie.mpg
Only 11,59 there, but a little higher speed, 207 km/h. Should correct myself too, when running 11,45 it only had a topspeed of 197 km/h. If the damn gearbox didnÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´t blow up everytime they try to add more boost, it should be able to run under 11 seconds. And thatÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´s really no bs. I donÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´t like to lie...

Posted by: Benji Sep 16 2004, 05:22 PM

AJO, i own you and you know it, most of them are ghey. Saabs are nice. Don't post anymore.

Posted by: Woffle Sep 16 2004, 05:22 PM

That Evo V looks like a Evo VI

Posted by: Rayn Sep 16 2004, 05:43 PM

im no evo expert but i agree that looks like a 6 to me as well. that first car is terrible looking.

Posted by: [ Mizerok ] Sep 16 2004, 06:46 PM

QUOTE (Ben @ Sep 16 2004, 09:22 PM)

AJO, i own you and you know it, most of them are ghey. Saabs are nice. Don't post anymore.

Shutup???

ONTOPIC::

The cars look great!!! In my eyes, speed is almost all that matters... looks comes second. So if I walk up to a car and tell the owner that it is ugly, then he tells me that it runs 9's... I will be.. B-E-A-UTIFUL car man... awesome.

Posted by: But she looked 18 officer Sep 16 2004, 06:55 PM

QUOTE (AJO @ Sep 16 2004, 05:21 PM)

*shrugs, tbh I was thinkging it was a typeo. I can believe 400 to 450hp for mid 11's but 600 is a stretch... *shrugs
Best I can think of is the high elevation+ not so wide tires+well, I dont know. lol
It is fast though either way though, I will give'm that.

QUOTE (86Dreams @ Sep 16 2004, 5:20 PM)

nice sig/avatar

*just a little disturbed

Posted by: krazyndn411 Sep 16 2004, 10:01 PM

its doesn't have to be BS. I have SEEN 650rwhp Supras do low 11s
and that first car is ugly

Posted by: Kamui Sep 16 2004, 11:52 PM

sweeds..can't play football, least they have that evo and henrik larrson

Posted by: But she looked 18 officer Sep 17 2004, 12:32 AM

QUOTE (krazyndn411 @ Sep 16 2004, 10:01 PM)

its doesn't have to be BS. I have SEEN 650rwhp Supras do low 11s
and that first car is ugly

supra's wiegh quite a bit more then the sierra cosworth. I think its almost a 600lb difference in stock form.

Posted by: [ Mizerok ] Sep 17 2004, 01:05 AM

Yeah, most Turbo Supras weigh a TON, it's almost sick. One of the major things to do to them is to do massive weight reductions. You would get sick over the amount of weight that that damned car could lose through weight reductions.

Posted by: krazyndn411 Sep 17 2004, 05:51 AM

QUOTE (Nick @ Sep 17 2004, 12:32 AM)

QUOTE (krazyndn411 @ Sep 16 2004, 10:01 PM)

its doesn't have to be BS. I have SEEN 650rwhp Supras do low 11s
and that first car is ugly

supra's wiegh quite a bit more then the sierra cosworth. I think its almost a 600lb difference in stock form.

i thought you were saying it should be slower

Posted by: 1slowsupra Sep 17 2004, 09:33 AM

HEY! Stop knockin Supras, or ill start knockin skulls!

Supras weight just as much as any sports car in its field. Skylines, Vettes, 3000GT, 300Zs, etc...

Ive seen 800rwhp run 11s...and Ive seen street Supras run 9s.

Posted by: But she looked 18 officer Sep 17 2004, 10:46 AM

QUOTE (1slowsupra @ Sep 17 2004, 09:33 AM)

If its any consolation I still wish I had one...

well, kinda they do... a vette weighs allot less, they are all in the 3,100/3,800lb range..

800hp and it does 11's? Susp problems? Or does he like to give fat wemon rides? lol

Posted by: krazyndn411 Sep 17 2004, 02:32 PM

QUOTE (1slowsupra @ Sep 17 2004, 09:33 AM)

We need some of those 8seconds supras here

Posted by: Rayn Sep 18 2004, 02:10 AM

i wouldnt say the supra is that heavy, then again my car weighs more than an mkiv. besides, i wouldnt care to drag with a supra much, but on a highway that 2j really shines

Posted by: 1slowsupra Sep 18 2004, 03:19 AM

QUOTE (Nick @ Sep 17 2004, 10:46 AM)

If its any consolation I still wish I had one...

well, kinda they do... a vette weighs allot less, they are all in the 3,100/3,800lb range..

800hp and it does 11's? Susp problems? Or does he like to give fat wemon rides? lol

HAHA naw its kool. Go ahead and crack on us..cuz it is true.

One thing you guys need to know, alot of Supra owners are straight up weird and come from all walks of life...unlike the other car owners, our community is very disfunctional and all hate each other and everyone. Ive meet doctors, lawyers, grandpa's with some serious beasts...and then Id meet fukin kids with their daddys wallet that have like 700hp Supras. Alot of them build their supras up for different fields of racing...some are just straight dyno queens, some are just for the track, some just for drag racing, some just to have, and some just for show. Its the guys that mix the catagorys that run such shitty times at the track. Supras can do several things great, but you would have to stick in one catagory to do it well...here these guys try to do several things well. Youll see these guys with track suspensions and track tires trying to drag race...show guys wit heavy bling bling rims on shit tires, or dyno queens w/ no suspension work trying to run good times. Ive meet guys that drag, not to get a good time, but to see their trap speeds..cuz trap speed is the best way of knowing exactly how much power your car has. The stock IRS is what really hinders the Supra from running any type of good time also. The Supras that run good times in the quarter mile are the ones that are strictly drag Supras.

QUOTE

i wouldnt say the supra is that heavy, then again my car weighs more than an mkiv. besides, i wouldnt care to drag with a supra much, but on a highway that 2j really shinesÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â

Man you got that right. Im sure you know as well. Supras are untouchable on the freeway. I can lose in the quarter mile but blow them away like they were parked going up to 150mph. It is geared perfectly..The 5th and 6th gears are monsters..5th gear is close to 1:1 ratio, and the 6th is no gas saving gear like the Vettes. Nothing but performance was in mind. Toyota spent zero money and zero time on economy engineering for the Supra.

Posted by: AJO Sep 18 2004, 05:29 PM

I like all about the supras except the looks... My opinion is this -> it looks like a teletubbie-car... hmmm, hate tha back of it... to smooth for my taste, the skyline or NSX or 3kgt or 850CSI or Vette or some other car is better looking... It should look like its drawn with a... hmmm... donÃƒâ€šÃ‚Â´t know the word in english, but that thing that u messure things with when in school? Plastic thing with inches or cm on it? Well...

For you supra enthusiasts -> swedish supra, I think the pic says it all... http://www.supramannen-racing.com/mainimage3-1.gif

Posted by: Sobær Sep 19 2004, 05:46 AM

QUOTE (1slowsupra @ Sep 17 2004, 11:33 AM)

You never mentioned the almighty FD.. and I do believe the FD is one of the lightest in it's class.. could be wrong, I tend to be when i get 3 hours a sleep for 2 days in a row..

Posted by: Rayn Sep 19 2004, 07:34 AM

i think thats why he wrote "etc..."

Posted by: Sobær Sep 19 2004, 07:55 AM

But the FD, I "THINK" is lighter than all of those cars, most for sure.. that was the only reason I pointed it out.

Posted by: Rayn Sep 19 2004, 07:58 AM

closest weight that he listed is the vette (compared to the fd i mean.)

Posted by: Sobær Sep 19 2004, 08:02 AM

To me, personally, the Vette is in a world of it's own compared to all of those cars, but that's neither here nor there, my opinion solely.

It's funny, I'm so used to these light little cars like CRX's, 86's and what not, that when I see anything over 3,000lbs, I'm like, "DAMN! That's fat!" :: Meak laugh. :: But then I remember the FD3S is around 3 grand., give or take a hundred pounds or so.